| In the past few weeks, the bodies have been piling up fast and furiously. Fallout from [tag]subprime mortgages[/tag] – that is, home loans to borrowers with a blemished credit history – gone bad has wreaked havoc on the industry. Big names Washington Mutual (Charts) and HSBC have reported hits tied to their subprime business and there has been a nonstop barrage of bad news for [tag]major subprime lender[/tag]s, including New Century Financial (Charts) and NovaStar Financial (Charts). Now the worry is what happens to the economy if enough homeowners go into default and to the financial markets if enough investors take a bath on mortgage-related securities. |
|
As for foreclosures, they’re currently running 25 percent higher than they were this time last year, according to RealtyTrac. “We don’t have high unemployment, high interest rates or a slowing economy, but we’re seeing the number of foreclosure filings pushed above historic averages,” says Rick Sharga, a marketing exec for RealtyTrac. “You can’t underestimate the effect of higher risk loans.” Adding to the problem are jittery lenders who have suddenly begun to tighten their standards. “You’re seeing credit score requirements being increased. You’re seeing documentation firming up,” says Bob Walters, chief economist with Quicken Loans. “Fewer people will get loans and maybe rightly so.” The higher hurdles, while perhaps healthy for the long term, will cause a short- term credit crunch. Translation: delinquencies and foreclosures should rise, which will create more credit problems in a vicious cycle that will probably weigh on housing for the rest of the year. None of this is good news to investors in U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities, which now account for some 20 percent of the global fixed income market, the largest component. (more…)
|
During the December holidays, my adult son and daughter, along with their spouses and my three grandchildren, visited me at my home for several days. My daughter, a big-time New York City lawyer, suggested I “consider” putting the title to my house and two investment properties into a [tag]living trust[/tag] to avoid probate when I pass on. I am 86, in relatively good health, but death might not be too far away. When I explained I might want to sell or refinance my house, or perhaps get a reverse mortgage, she really didn’t have any good reason why I should consider a living trust. |
I highly recommend [tag]revocable living trusts[/tag] for everyone who owns a home or other major assets. A living trust has two primary benefits: (1) avoidance of Probate Court costs and delays after the trustor dies, and (2) management of the living-trust assets if the trustor becomes incapacitated before death. Perish the thought, but suppose you become incapacitated with Alzheimer’s disease or a severe stroke. If your major assets are in a living trust, and they need to be sold or refinanced to provide for your care, your successor trustee (probably your daughter or son) can handle that without Probate Court interference. However, if your major assets are not in a living trust, a conservator would have to be appointed by the Probate Court to manage your assets. However, if all goes well and you live to 120 and die of old age, you can continue managing your living-trust assets just as you do now, including buying and selling. When you die, your heirs will still get a new stepped-up basis to the market value on the date of your death (unless Congress changes the tax law). (more…)